Is Organic Meat Better: The Bottom Line Studies that have been done to test the difference of organic vs. conventional meat have shown minimal difference in regards to pesticides and contaminants. The Organic Center. While organic meat does offer some environmental and health benefits over factory farming in terms of residue, waste management, pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers, the livestock does not consume fewer resources or produce less manure. We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. Overall, the study found that organic grass-fed beef production has fewer environmental impacts than both conventional beef and non-organic grass-fed beef production. Plate Tectonics Puts Together the Puzzle of Earth's Shifting Crust, Information about the device's operating system, Information about other identifiers assigned to the device, The IP address from which the device accesses a client's website or mobile application, Information about the user's activity on that device, including web pages and mobile apps visited or used, Information about the geographic location of the device when it accesses a website or mobile application. While this study had a very small sample, it provides consumers and farmers food for thought. Get an unfiltered view from the fields, whether it’s an authentic organic farm or an industrial imposter. Organics support a healthier farm lifestyle and a healthier community Growing food organically does not harm the surrounding community in which it’s grown. Organic Grass-fed Beef is Better for the Environment Cornucopia’s Take: A recent Japanese study looked at the production methods used for beef cattle, generally considered to have higher environmental impacts than other livestock production. Grants for Livestock & Poultry Farmers – Apply Now! Weird & Wacky, Copyright © 2020 HowStuffWorks, a division of InfoSpace Holdings, LLC, a System1 Company. Small, local farmers often practice sustainable farming techniques, which emphasize the long-term care of the land including limiting the use of chemicals and rotating pastures to prevent overgrazing. Organic Grass-fed Beef is Better for the Environment. Cornucopia’s Take: A recent Japanese study looked at the production methods used for beef cattle, generally considered to have higher environmental impacts than other livestock production. Delve deeper into the nuances of organic with these videos. Despite Prince Charles’s claim that organic farming provides “major benefits for wildlife and the wider environment,” a 2006 British government report found no evidence that the environmental impact of organic farming is better than that of conventional methods. Organic grass-fed beef has less environmental impact than non-organic grass-fed beef Researchers used a lifecycle analysis to analyze data collected from one grass-fed farm prior to conversion to organic and then after its conversion to organic, as well as data from conventional non-grass-fed farms. The common perception that organic food is by default better, or is an ideal way to reduce environmental impact is a clear misconception. Yet, consuming large portions of organically produced meat will still have a bigger environmental impact than eating conventionally produced crops and fruits. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website. Another environmental benefit of organic meat is that you can usually find a local organic farmer or a grocer that sells locally raised meat. They found that organic and non-organic grass-fed beef production practices were more environmentally friendly than conventional production, with reduced impact on acidification, eutrophication (over-growth of algae and decrease of oxygen in bodies of water due to nutrient runoff), and energy consumption. Researchers studied the impacts of feed production, transportation, processing, animal management, enteric fermentation, and manure and its management. Across several metrics, organic agriculture actually proves to be more harmful for the world’s environment than conventional agriculture. However, there has been research indicating that organic meat has more unsaturated fat, including the anti-inflammatory omega 3’s. Organic farmers commonly opt for the Hubbard bird, which grows at a much more natural pace and has stronger legs, so it can roam free for its whole life. The global warming potential for organic grass-fed beef and conventional beef was not statistically different, although both out-performed non-organic grass-fed beef production. A recent study published in the Journal of Cleaner Production assessed the environmental impacts of organic grass-fed beef and non-organic grass-fed beef production. This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. That being said, both Wirsenius and McDermid agree that it is far more environmentally sustainable to eat organic chicken instead of beef that was produced conventionally. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. For Bob Hill, Growing Bananas Has Certain A ‘Peel’. Unlike non organic practices, organics keep toxins out of the air, out of the drinking water and out of the soil. Sign up for The Cornucopia Institute’s eNews and action alerts to stay informed about organic food and farm issues.